iManage

“I quite like iManage. For in house doc mgmt it’d be fine. It’s not for Plaintiff PI. In particular, once a word doc is uploaded to iManage, you can then download a “linked” copy that updates contemporaneously - save it where ever on your PC, and any changes made update to the one on the PC, in iManage, and whoever else has a copy of the linked version; great for collaboration. Basically, send the linked draft to the attorney and they can tweak as necessary, give it a last once over and ur g2”

“It’s a bit of a weird thing. Feels like it’s an add on to iManage rather than a separate product but it’s not really integrate properly. Not sure whether they think it’s a competitor to copilot Harvey et al or what”

“iManage does not yet have a true semantic search yet. I hear it is more of a hybrid lexical search with semantic search. Has much need to mature if that is the case.”

“They deserve to lose in the long run obviously but my word the fact that they have been embedded in the legal space, already had word and email plugins and lawyers were used to their systems, I cannot think of a bigger f-up than this company. Harvey valued at $15 bil and we are still switching between iManage and Harvey…”

“iManage, good document management and reliable, once setup and readied | iManage Work is a great solution for a smaller business. It provides a quick, easy way to store and share documents. It works with Outlook, which almost everyone utilizes, so it's a good way to get into document management. iManage Work is capable of scaling, but it is not necessarily the best solution for it. There are many other solutions that scale very nicely for enterprise size. | Pros: Very reliable, once setup it ”

“Sort of off topic but a PSA. The iManage MCP for Claude is a privilege and security disaster in waiting. Claude does not obey client matter document retrieval instructions and keeps pulling docs from other matters. Be careful…”

“Haven't used netdocuments, but I have a longstanding rage affair with iManage. iManage is usually fine, but when it encounters a sync issue you can wind up losing hours of work. The newer web-based iManage seems to have a lot of bugs/flakiness (e.g., not being able to give a document a name when you save it, so you have to go in and change it later). Generally it's fine, but when it fails, it can be a real rage-inducing nightmare. I have no idea if others are any better though.”

“Excelente programa pero que requiere mucha capacitación. — Necessary evil. A massive firm needs a solid document management system and this accomplished the goal. I wish it was not as complex. — This stores documents and creates consistency across a massive organization. Documents can be saved in many versions and easily sent as links. — This software is very glitchy and feels labyrinth like when navigating. The software often crashes and occasionally wipes documents.”

“I quite like iManage. For in house doc mgmt it’d be fine. It’s not for Plaintiff PI. In particular, once a word doc is uploaded to iManage, you can then download a “linked” copy that updates contemporaneously - save it where ever on your PC, and any changes made update to the one on the PC, in iManage, and whoever else has a copy of the linked version; great for collaboration. Basically, send the linked draft to the attorney and they can tweak as necessary, give it a last once over and ur g2”

“Poor Performance: This app mirrors the lack of intuitive features that the actual product has. My firm got this service and it has slowed and delayed my practice significantly. The app similar creates no additional value as near as I can tell and you can barely log into it”

“Can't login. Nowhere to type user name or password. All it shows me is a screen asking me to log into "demo," but not even that works.”

“It’s a bit of a weird thing. Feels like it’s an add on to iManage rather than a separate product but it’s not really integrate properly. Not sure whether they think it’s a competitor to copilot Harvey et al or what”